检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚曙明[1]
机构地区:[1]湖南工业大学,湖南株洲412008
出 处:《株洲工学院学报》2006年第5期34-36,共3页Journal of Zhuzhou Institute of Technology
摘 要:宪法的传统效力范围是公法领域。但随着公民积极权力理论的发展,宪法的私域效力问题亦渐次被学界所关注。其中德国学界先后出现宪法私域直接效力论和宪法私域间接效力说两种绝然对立的理论;美国则径行以国家行为来判定宪法的私域效力。宪法的私域效力在中国的语境中被置换为宪法司法化或者宪法私法化。学界对宪法私域效力理论褒贬各异。但中国社会在发展中已经产生了宪法私域适用的需要,因此宪法私域效力理论在中国的适用几成定势。The traditional effect scope of the constitution is in the public law realm. With the development of the citizen's aggressive right theories, the academic circles began to pay close attention to the private area effect of the constitution. Among thcm, German scholars have put forward two opposing doctrines: the indirect effect theory and the direct effect theory; Americans judge the private effect of the constitution directly by the national behaviors, this so-called the national behavior theory. In China the private effect of the constitution is changed to such terms as the judicial reviewing or privatization of the constitution. However, the development of China has already produced the demand for the application of the private effect of constitution and made it a necessity for the theoretical study on the private effect of constitution and its application in China.
分 类 号:D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15