检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,重庆市400044
出 处:《中国管理科学》2006年第4期100-107,共8页Chinese Journal of Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70473107)
摘 要:以机构投资者追求期望效用最大化为目标,求解出了他们在两种不同询价规则,即询价前和询价后确定机构投资者IPO配售比例下的最优报价策略,进而建立了IPO定价和抑价模型。对模型的分析表明,为规避IPO申购中的“赢者诅咒”问题和追求更高的期望抑价,机构投资者有隐藏真实需求的激励。而引入供给不确定性可以阻止投资者采用极端的需求隐藏策略,从而消除确定供给情形下可能存在的部分高抑价区间,因此具有更高的询价效率。On the objective of maximizing the institutional investors' expected utility, this paper works out their optimal bidding strategies under two difference bookbuilding regulations that is, to decide the institutional investors' IPO allocation shares before and after their bidding. Furthermore, we establish the IPO pricing and underpricing models. Our analysis indicates that institutional investors have incentive to shade their demands in order to avoiding the "Winner' s Curse" and pursuing higher expected IPO underpricing. Supply uncertainty could prohibit the extreme demand reduction and eliminate some high underpricing section which may exist under the condition of certain supply,So, it. has higher IPO bookbuilding efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117