“剑桥资本争论”的回顾与展望  

“Cambridge Capital Argument”:Retrospect and Prospect

作　　者：曹剑[1] 林铁铮[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学经济学院,天津300071

出　　处：《天津商学院学报》2006年第5期9-14,54,共7页Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce

摘　　要：“剑桥资本争论”指出了新古典理论在资本计量、技术再转折和资本倒流等关键内容上所遇到的逻辑悖论。这是由于西方主流经济学将凯恩斯经济学嫁接在新古典的价值和分配理论之上,而忽视了资本主义所特有的竞争关系。相反,马克思的古典经济学则强调了资本主义所特有的经济关系。因此只有引入社会关系的古典一般均衡分析,才是解决争论的出路。＂ Cambridge capital argument＂ illustrates some logic paradoxes of Neo-classic economics with the concepts of ＂Capital Measurement＂, ＂ Reswitching of Technique＂ and ＂ Reverse Capital＂, caused by the wrongly commingling of Keynes＇ economics and the value and distribution theory of neo-classical economics, neglecting the special competitive relation of the capitalism. In contrast, Marx＇s economics deeply studied economic relations among the total variables on the base of social relations. The only solution to this argument is to introduce the classical general equilibrium of social relation.

关 键 词：剑桥资本争论 新古典理论 马克思经济学 

分 类 号：F091.347[经济管理—政治经济学]