检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁俊韬[1]
出 处:《韶关学院学报》2006年第7期47-50,共4页Journal of Shaoguan University
摘 要:最高人民法院《关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》是继“精神损害赔偿”司法解释之后对人身权保护的又一次飞跃,在统一性、补白性、合理性和科学性上均有创新和突破。但该解释在理论和实践上亦存在着不足,反映了我国立法技术欠成熟和司法解释欠完善问题。立法应当立足于“人”和“一般人身权”的新高度,全面审视人身关系的价值。The judicial interpretation is a great leap on protection of person rights after the judicial interpretation of compensation of spiritual damage. And it makes big innovations and breaks in four aspects: oneness, complementarity, rationality and science. But at the same time , there are deficiencies both on theory and in practice simultaneously which reflected that the technology of legislation in our country is not mature and the judicial interpretation is not perfect complete. The value of people relates based on " the person" and " the common person rights" should be reexamined, so as to provide personal opinions on legislation and in the judicial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229