两种抗真菌药治疗甲癣成本效果分析  

Cost-Effective Analysis of Two Antifungal Agents in the Treatment of Tinea Unguium

作　　者：叶沛光[1] 黄余龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省东莞市人民医院药剂科,广东东莞523018

出　　处：《现代生物医学进展》2006年第8期49-50,共2页Progress in Modern Biomedicine

摘　　要：目的:对特比萘芬、氟康唑2种不同抗真菌药物治疗60例甲癣病患者的成本效果分析。方法:选择60例病例,随机分为2组,分别给予特比萘芬、氟康唑治疗,观察各组疗效并运用成本效果法进行分析。结果:2种药物均有较好的抗真菌疗效,特比萘芬疗效优于氟康唑,但氟康唑最具有成本效果。结论:药物经济学分析结果为氟康唑治疗甲癣病较优。Objective： Cost - effectiveness analysis of terbinafine and flueonazole in the treatment of 60 cases of tinea unguium was conducted, Methods： 60 patients with finea unguium were randomly divided into two therapeutic groups, treated with terbinafine and iluconazole, respectively, The efficacies in each group were observed and cost- effectiveness analysis was conducted. Results： The two anfifungal agents showed good therapeutic efficacies, in which, the therapeutic efficacy of terbinafine was better than that of fluconazole while the cost - effectiveness of fluconazole was better than that of terbinafine. Conclusion：The cost - effectiveness analysis showed that fluconazole was better in the treatment of tinea unguium.

关 键 词：特比萘芬 氟康唑 甲癣 成本-效果分析 

分 类 号：R956[医药卫生—药学]