检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《化工学报》2006年第9期2053-2057,共5页CIESC Journal
基 金:湖南省自然科学基金项目(05JJ30026).~~
摘 要:The three-demensional turbulent flow in a stirred vessel driven by a Rushton turbine was simulated by using the anisotropic differential Reynolds stress model (RSM).The effect of the turbulent model, modeling approach and discretization scheme on mean velocities and turbulent kinetic energy was investigated.The RSM was found to give vortex structure and positions near the blade reasonably.The two peak distribution of turbulent intensity near the blade tip could be effectively reflected by both the RSM and the anisotropic k-ε model;however the predicted results of velocity fluctuations by the RSM and the sliding mesh approach showed better agreement with the reported experimental data than by the anisotropic k-ε model and the multiple reference frames(MRF)approach, and the simulated turbulent kinetic energy was still under-predicted by the RSM.The simulated results validated by reported experimental data showed that the prediction ability for turbulent flow by the QUICK scheme approached second-order upwind scheme’s ability and both of them were better than first-order precision schemes.The three-demensional turbulent flow in a stirred vessel driven by a Rushton turbine was simulated by using the anisotropic differential Reynolds stress model (RSM). The effect of the turbulent model, modeling approach and discretization scheme on mean velocities and turbulent kinetic energy was investigated. The RSM was found to give vortex structure and positions near the blade reasonably. The two peak distribution of turbulent intensity near the blade tip could be effectively reflected by both the RSM and the anisotropic k-~ model; however the predicted results of velocity fluctuations by the RSM and the sliding mesh approach showed better agreement with the reported experimental data than by the anisotropic k-~ model and the multiple reference frames (MRF) approach, and the simulated turbulent kinetic energy was still under-predicted by the RSM. The simulated results validated by reported experimental data showed that the prediction ability for turbulent flow by the QUICK scheme approached second-order upwind scheme's ability and both of them were better than first-order precision schemes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117