检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任自力[1]
出 处:《中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2006年第3期68-72,共5页Journal of China Agricultural University;Social Sciences
基 金:中国-欧盟村务管理培训项目资助(项目合同号:ALA/CHN/96/3-VG/PMO/AR/20042027)
摘 要:《宪法》与《村民委员会组织法》中关于村民委员会性质与法律地位规定的疏漏,是实践中人们对村民委员会性质与法律地位认识存在混乱及实践中村民委员会诉讼地位存在争议的根本原因。重新设置《宪法》中的村民自治条款、完善《村组法》的规定,单一化村民委员会的含义,并赋予村民自治体以独立法人资格,是明晰村民委员会法律地位、纠正相关错误认识的根本途径。The oversight in the prescriptions of the nature and legal status of the village committee in the Constitution and the Organizational Law for the Village Committee is the root causing the confusions of understanding of the nature and legal status of the villager committee and of the disputes on litigation status of the village committee. The fundamental approach to clarify the legal status of the village committee and to correct the mistakes in understanding is to revise the relevant clauses in the Constitution and improve the provisions in the organizational law for the village committee, to singularise the implication of the village committee and to grant the status of legal person to the village self-governance body.
分 类 号:D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28