墨家与亚里士多德命题论之比较  

Comparison between Mohist and Aristotelian Theories of Proposition

作　　者：许锦云[1] 

机构地区：[1]中共郑州市委党校,河南郑州450007

出　　处：《河南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2006年第5期17-20,共4页Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金资助项目"中国现代文化视野下的逻辑思潮研究"(05CZX017)

摘　　要：命题理论是逻辑学的重要内容。墨家和亚里士多德都讨论了命题的本质、命题的类型及关系、模态命题等基本问题,形成了丰富的命题理论。但他们对这些问题的讨论又有很大差异。比较二者的同异,有利于进一步认识中西方古代逻辑的相同本质和不同特点。The theory of proposition is the important content of logic. Both Mohist School and Aristotle discuss the basic problems of proposition which are the nature of proposition, the types and relations of proposition, model propositions etc. This forms their abundant theories of proposition. There are many differences between their theories of proposition, Comparing between their identities and differences, which is /urther advantageous to understand the identical nature and different characteristics of ancient logic in China and the West.

关 键 词：墨家 亚里士多德 命题论 

分 类 号：B81-06[哲学宗教—逻辑学]