检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广西壮族自治区人民医院心内科,南宁530022 [2]武汉大学人民医院心内科,430060
出 处:《微创医学》2006年第1X期14-15,共2页Journal of Minimally Invasive Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨5F共用型造影导管经肱动脉穿刺行冠状动脉造影的安全性及成功率。方法选择经肱动脉径路行冠状动脉造影患者486例,分为Judkins型组即A组(n=201)和共用型组即B组(n=285)。对比两组造影成功率、X线透视时间和手术操作时间以及并发症等。结果①A组186例(93.8%)造影成功,B组282例(97.8%)造影成功,两组比较差异有显著性(x^2=13.58,P〈0.01);A组的冠状动脉造影平均X线透视时间和手术操作时间分别为(7.9±5.1)min和(31.8±20.2)min;B组分别为(5.3±3.5)和(23.9±11.4)min,差异有显著性(u=6-3和u=5.5,P〈0.05)。结论使用较小直径造影导管即5F共用型导管经肱动脉径路施行诊断性冠状动脉造影,成功率高于Judkins型导管,且X线透视时间和手术操作时间均较短。Objective To evaluate the safety and rate of success of the application of 5F multifunction catheter in transbrachial coronary angiography (CAG). Methods 486 cases who had recei-ved transbrachial CAG was divided into two groups, Judkins Gotlp (Goup A,n=201)and multifunction catheter group ( Group B, n=285 ).The rate of success,the duration of exposure to x-ray, the operation time and the complications were compared. Results Group A had a higher rate of success (93.8% vs 97.8%,x^2=13.58,P〈0.01), the average exposure time and operation time in Group A were ( 7.9 ± 5.1 ) min and ( 31.8 ± 20.2 ) min, while ( 5.3 ± 3.5 ) min and ( 23.9 ± 11.4 ) min in group B. There was significant difference between two groups. Conclusion Transbrachial CAG With 5F multifunction catheter has a higher rate of success, shorter duration of exposure to x-ray and operation time than with Judkins-type catheter.
关 键 词:冠状动脉造影 肱动脉 共用型导管 Judkins型导管
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3