检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴宣恭[1]
出 处:《当代经济研究》2006年第10期1-6,共6页Contemporary Economic Research
摘 要:企业内部的雇佣劳动关系与外部市场关系有本质的不同,新制度经济学抹杀了这种差异,其产权范畴不够准确严密,不能很好地解释当代经济发展的实际。马克思主义经济学科学分析了企业的本质和功能,论证了企业产权的结构和成因、产权的分离和让渡,具有逻辑自洽性和很强的现实解释力,能够指导我国产权改革走上正确道路。There are essential differences between the internal relations of firms and the outside ones of market. The new institutional economics denies the important differences, and its category of property rights isn't accurate. The theory of new institutional economics can't explain the practice of firm development. Marxist economics scientifically analyzed the nature and function of firms and demonstrated the structure and causes of firm property rights, and analyzed the separation and releasing of it as well. Marxist theory of firm property rights has consistent logic and can explain the practice of firm development. We should take Marxist theory of firm property rights as guiding ideology to prompt the reform of property rights of enterprises.
关 键 词:产权 企业关系 企业契约理论 新制度经济学 产权改革
分 类 号:F014.1[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38