检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马曙光[1]
机构地区:[1]审计署人事教育司,100830
出 处:《审计研究》2006年第5期23-28,22,共7页Auditing Research
摘 要:政府审计法律制度的产生是利益相关者进化博弈的均衡结果,变迁是暴力潜能分配的博弈改进,其发展和完善对传统文化与历史具有路径依赖性。中国社会公众参与《审计法》修订的广度与深度表明,中国《审计法》的完善较好地体现出社会公众对政府审计功能调整与实现的内生性期望。提高审计博弈过程的透明度,拓宽公众参与审计博弈的途径,是审计法律制度完善的一种有效方式。The emergence of the law institution of government auditing is the balanced result of the evolution and struggle among the stakeholders. The struggle and improvement of the assignment of violent potential makes the changes, whose development and improvement having path dependence on the traditional cultures and the histories. The Chinese public has actively participated in the revision of Audit Law these years. The scope and depeh of such participation shows that the improvement of the Chinese Audit Law reflected the endogenetic expectation of the public to the adjustment and fulfillment of government auditing function. It is an effective way to perfect the auditing legal institution by improving the transparency of audit gaming process, and exploring more paths for the public to participate in this process.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.193