交锁髓内钉和加压接骨板治疗下肢长干骨骨折的疗效  

Interlocking intramedullary nail and compression dimension plate in treatment of long bone fracture of lower extremity

作　　者：何琦松 郑璐[1] 余桦[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海市中西医结合医院骨科,上海200082

出　　处：《临床骨科杂志》2006年第5期442-443,共2页Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics

摘　　要：目的比较交锁髓内钉和加压接骨板治疗下肢长干骨骨折的临床疗效。方法对87例采用交锁髓内钉和加压接骨板治疗的下肢长干骨骨折手术患者随访4～24个月,对两种方法的临床情况、术后并发症进行比较分析。结果交锁髓内钉组患者的临床愈合时间、术后并发症均少于加压接骨板组,临床疗效优于加压接骨板组。结论交锁髓内钉治疗下肢长干骨骨折的临床疗效优于加压接骨板。Objective To compare the clinical effects of interlocking intramedullary nail and compression dimention plate in treatment of long bone fracture of lower extremity. Methods 87 patients after operations with interlocking intramedullary nails and compression dimention plates in treatment of long bone fractures of lower extremity were observed and studied. The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 24 months. The operating time, the amount of bleeding, the time to removing internal fixation, the healing time and complications of these two methods were compared. Results The healing time and complications in treatment with interlocking intramedullary nail were less than that with compression dimention plate. The clinical effects with interlocking intramedullary nail were better. Conclusions The clinical effect with interlocking intramedullary nail is better than that with compression dimention plate in treatment of long bone fracture of lower extremity.

关 键 词：长干骨骨折 腿损伤/外科学 交锁髓内钉 加压接骨板 骨折固定术 内 

分 类 号：R683.42[医药卫生—骨科学] R687.32[医药卫生—外科学]