检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学船舶海洋与建筑工程学院,上海200030
出 处:《舰船科学技术》2006年第5期43-47,共5页Ship Science and Technology
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(10202014)
摘 要:可调动力吸振器的出现拓展了动力吸振器的应用范围,然而将其应用于降噪声学设计,目前研究得并不充分,这主要是由于声学实验和声学数值仿真的代价与难度所致。本文采用声学边界元法与结构动力优化方法,研究了四边简支板在不同设计准则下采用可调动力吸振器进行降噪声学设计的效果,为可调谐动力吸振器的降噪应用提供指导。数值计算结果表明,将调谐、解调作为声学设计策略各有优缺点。调谐策略的优点是能将动力吸振器作用区域附近的振动降为最低,但并不能保证噪声指标减少最多。解调策略的优点是能将全局声学指标降到最低,但在实际应用中噪声信号的采集和反馈控制代价过高。本文建议采用振动水平极小化策略来代替解调和调谐策略进行声学优化设计。数值计算结果与文献实验结果的对比验证了本文策略的有效性。同时本文研究了动力吸振器参数对主振系统整体和局部模态的影响。Vibration absorbers have been widely used to minimize the vibration of structures, while studies on the reduction of noise are not fully operated because of the costs and difficulties in acoustic numerical simulation and experiment. The presented paper verified the effectiveness of noise reduction using the adaptive tuned vibration absorbers (ATVA) for simply supported plate by means of acoustic boundary element method and structural dynamic optimal method. Numerical results show that using the tune method for acoustic design can deeply reduce the locally vibration, but it can not guarantee the most global reduction of noise;while using detune method can minimize the global sound pressure level with the expense of signal collection and feedback control. Finally a new acoustic design method concerning the global least square vibration is proposed, and numerical results show the validity of the method. In addition, the paper shows the effects on the global and local modes of vibrating system because of changes with vibration absorber's parameters.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117