两种动脉血气标本采集法的效果分析  

作　　者：高华 李晓燕 

机构地区：[1]平顶山市第二人民医院呼吸科,河南平顶山467000

出　　处：《现代临床护理》2006年第5期67-68,共2页Modern Clinical Nursing

摘　　要：目的比较两种动脉血气标本采集法的效果。方法将586例次行动脉血气标本采集随机分为观察组296例次和对照组290例次,观察组采用动脉血气针;对照组采用一次性塑料注射器。比较两组穿刺所需时间与成功例数。结果两组穿刺所需时间与成功率比较,经统计学分析,均P<0.01,差异有统计学意义。结论采用动脉血气针采集动脉血气标本具有应用方便,穿刺所需时间短,穿刺成功率高等优点。Objective To compare the effectiveness of two ways to collect arterial blood gas samples. Methods 586 arterial blood gas samples were divided into the observation group and the control group. 296 samples in the observation group were collected through arterial blood gas needle, while 290 samples in the control group were collected through plastic syringe. Time required to puncture and the success rate in the two groups were compared. Results Significant differences were found in time required to puncture and the success rate in the two groups （ P〈0.05 ）. Conclusion It is convenient and takes less time and the success rate is high when samples are collected though arterial blood gas needle.

关 键 词：动脉血气针 一次性塑料注射器 动脉血气标本 临床应用 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]