房屋类型与持续采集对野生壁蜂采集效果的影响  

Effect of House Type and Continuous Collection on Collection Effect of Wild Osmia

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:金大勇[1] 吕龙石[1] 

机构地区:[1]延边大学农学院,龙井133400

出  处:《吉林农业大学学报》2006年第5期498-500,共3页Journal of Jilin Agricultural University

基  金:吉林省科技基金资助项目(20040547-3)

摘  要:为进一步提高野生壁蜂的采集效率,研究了不同房屋类型与持续采集对野生壁蜂采集效果的影响。结果表明:草房与空房之间的满管率无显著差异,分别为47.83%和44.20%;草房、空房与瓦房之间的满管率差异显著,瓦房的满管率只有18.34%;采集次数对野生壁蜂采集效果的影响显著,3年间采集总数逐年递减,递减率达30.5%~38.3%,野生壁蜂的茧巢比也逐年下降,下降率为16.8%-58.4%。In order to improve the collection effect of wild Osmia, effects of different types of houses and times of collection on collection effect were performed in this test. The results show that there is no evident difference between thatched cottage and vacant room in full-tube ratio, 47,83% and 44.20% respectively; but there is significant difference between tile-house and thatched cottage or vacant room, the ratio of tile-house's full-tube is only 18.34%. Times of collection influenced collection effect significantly. In a three-year period, the total of collection times has reduced year by year, and the decrease rate is between 30.5 % and 38.3 % The cocoon/nest has reduced year by year, too, and its decrease rate is between 16.8% and 58.4%.

关 键 词:角额壁蜂 房屋类型 采集次数 采集效果 

分 类 号:Q969.54[生物学—昆虫学] S893.9[农业科学—特种经济动物饲养]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象