颅面部螺旋CT三维线距测量的准确性评价  被引量:21

The accuracy of 3D-CT volume rendering for craniofacial linear measurements

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:刘东旭[1] 王春玲[1] 刘莉[1] 董作英[1] 柯华峰[1] 于朝阳 

机构地区:[1]山东大学口腔医学院口腔正畸研究所,山东济南250012 [2]山东省电力医院放射科,山东济南250012

出  处:《上海口腔医学》2006年第5期517-520,共4页Shanghai Journal of Stomatology

基  金:山东省科技厅2005年攻关项目(2005GG4202017)~~

摘  要:目的:研究颅面部螺旋CT三维线距测量与实测距离的一致性。方法:选择12个干燥头颅,采用GE公司16层螺旋CT常规扫描后,将头颅数据转至工作站,进行颅颌面三维重建。选择正畸常用的16个颅面骨性解剖标志点,分别使用DisplayTools测量工具和游标卡尺进行20个项目测量。采用SAS9.0统计软件包进行配对t检验,比较螺旋CT三维线距测量与实测距离的一致性。结果:螺旋CT三维线距测量与游标卡尺实测结果相比,P值范围为0.0995~0.9812,所有测量项目均无显著性差异。结论:螺旋CT体绘制图像颅面解剖标志点间线性距离与实测距离具有一致性,螺旋CT三维测量有望替代实际测量,用于头影测量分析。PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the consistency of craniofacial measurements using spiral computed tomography volume rendering by computer systems and sliding caliper. METHODS: The study population consisted of 12 cadaver heads which were examined with spiral CT. The archived CT data were transferred to a workstation, and 3D-CT volume rendered images were generated using computer graphics tools. Linear measurements (n= 20), based upon conventional craniometric anatomical landmarks (n=16) were made, by Display Tools and sliding caliper respectively. The consistency between the two measurements was analyzed by paired t test using SAS9.0 software package. RESULTS: The results demonstrated no statistically significant difference between imaging measurement and physical measurement, P〉0.05. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant consistency between spiral CT measurement and physical measurement for craniofacial linear distance. 3D-CT volume rendering images using craniometric measurements can be used for clinical and basic studies in stomatology.

关 键 词:螺旋CT 颅面 实际测量 线距 准确性分析 

分 类 号:R816.98[医药卫生—放射医学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象