检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]暨南大学管理学院,广东广州260034 [2]山东大学经济学院,山东济南250100
出 处:《产业经济研究》2006年第5期21-32,65,共13页Industrial Economics Research
摘 要:本文从转轨国家自然垄断行业引入竞争可能性以及所有制改革模式的选择入手,研究在加入策略性激励机制后竞争与所有制模式的不同组合对自然垄断企业绩效的影响。研究发现,转轨国家自然垄断行业改革进程取决于转轨国家市场发育程度以及改革的初始条件;混合所有制的企业竞争模式比完全私有化的社会福利水平要高,也是更适合于转轨国家自然垄断行业改革的所有制选择模式。Competition and reform of ownership are main trends in the regulatory reform of natural monopoly industries. But the old theory and experience is for the developed countries and for transition countries there are no ready-made theories and experiences of how to harmonize transition economy and the reform of natural monopoly industries. This paper, starting from the possibility of introducing competition system and the choices of the modes of ownership reform in the natural monopoly industries in transition countries, studies the influences of competition and the different combination of ownership modes on the performance of natural monopoly enterprises after introducing strategic incentive mechanism. The study indicates that the reform progress of natural monopoly industries in transition countries lies on the degree of their market development and the beginning conditions of the reform and that the social welfare level of mixed ownership enterprises is higher than that of completely private ownership ones and therefore is the mode more suitable for the reform of natural monopoly industries in transition countries.
关 键 词:经济转轨 自然垄断 社会福利 所有制模式 激励机制
分 类 号:F062.9[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3