结构实在论评析  

A Critical Analysis of Structural Realism

作　　者：王巍[1] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学科技与社会研究中心,北京100084

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2006年第11期34-38,48,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

摘　　要：曹天予提出的结构实在论知识论版本在科学哲学界有很大影响,并引发了《综合》期刊专刊讨论。他既批评反实在论的观点,也对结构实在论的知识版本与本体版本有所批判。他从结构、本体、建构这三个概念出发,论证了科学理论的客观性体现为建构性、历史性、整体性、修正性、革命性。本文对曹天予的结构实在论进行了系统的梳理与分析。笔者赞同他对“不充分决定”论旨的批评,对他批评“本体论不连续性”持中立态度,但对他的“普遍语法论证”有所存疑。The epistemological version of structural realism, raised by prof. CAO Tian Yu, has great influence in philosophy of science. Syntheses had a special volume to discuss the topic. Cao criticizes anti-realism, as well as the epistemic version and the ontic version of structural realism. From the concepts of structure, ontology, and construct, he analyzes the objectivity of scientific thcories into five aspects： construction, historicity, holism, revision, and revolution. The paper gives a systematic analysis and comment of his philosophy. The author agrees with his criticism of under-determination thesis, is neutral to his argument against ontological discontinuity, but questions his universal language argument.

关 键 词：结构实在论 结构 本体 建构 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]