检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:夏涵[1] 府伟灵[1] 陈鸣[1] 王丰[1] 赵渝徽[1]
出 处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2006年第11期1218-1220,1224,共4页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
摘 要:目的探讨一种高效的压电石英晶体DNA传感器固定的方法。方法分别采用常规自组装法(未还原探针法)与探针预先经过还原的自组装法(还原探针法),将针对铜绿假单胞菌的探针固定在DNA传感器的金膜表面,比较不同探针浓度下,探针固定和杂交反应所引起的频率的变化以及所用的时间。结果与未还原探针法相比,还原探针法具有探针固定量大、反应速度快、频率下降明显等优点。结论还原探针法提高了DNA探针的固定效率,优于未还原探针法。OBJECTIVE To discuss a highly effective method to immobilize probe on the surfaces of piezoelectric DNA sensors. METHODS Pseudomonas aeruginosa probe was immobilized on the gold surface of gene sensor array with routine self-assembly method (SAM) (non-reduction method) and SAM with deoxidized probe (reduction method), respectively. The changes in frequency and time-cost were compared in reactions with different concentrations of probe. RESULTS Reduction method had the advantage of more probe immobilization;less time consumed in testing and higher changes in frequency during the reaction than non-reduction method. CONCLUSIONS Reduction method has a better ability to immobilize probe on the surfaces of piezoelectric DNA sensors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.14.157.158