检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《工程力学》2006年第11期28-32,57,共6页Engineering Mechanics
基 金:国家自然科学基金(10472051)
摘 要:以三维弹性力学问题为例,对快速多极与常规边界元法机群并行计算进行了比较。其中常规边界元法求解方程采用高斯消去法,通过调用标准并行求解函数库ScaLAPACK实现;快速多极边界元法并行计算程序采用ANSIC++语言、调用MPI并行通信库自行编写。两种程序均运行于同一机群并行环境。数值算例表明,在同样的机群条件下,采用快速多极边界元法可使解题规模有数量级的提高,计算速度明显高于常规边界元法,并行效率也优于常规边界元法。For 3D elasticity problems, the parallel computations based on the fast multipole and the conventional boundary element method (BEM) on PC cluster are compared. The parallel computation of conventional BEM applies Gauss elimination by calling the ScaLAPACK library, while the fast multipole version is implemented by programming with ANSI C++ and MPI (Message Passing Interface). Both approaches are tested on the same PC cluster. Numerical examples show that the scale of solvable problems can be increased significantly for the fast multipole BEM, and that the computational speed is much faster than conventional BEM. Besides, the parallel speedup of the fast multipole BEM is also higher than that of the conventional one.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.234.246