《圣济总录》乾隆本之版本状况分析  

Analysis on status of versions of Sheng ji zong lu ( Complete Record of Holy Benevolence) in Emperor Qianlong's reign

作　　者：王振国[1] 杨金萍[1] 何永[1] 金秀梅[1] 杨俊杰[1] 刘耀[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东中医药大学文献研究所,济南250014

出　　处：《中华医史杂志》2006年第4期206-210,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical History

基　　金：全国高校古籍整理研究课题"<圣济总录>整理研究"(0364)

摘　　要：《圣济总录》乾隆本为清代汪鸣珂于乾隆五十二年(1787)的重刊本。此本残漏补缺的情况较严重:①原书200卷,此本只有197卷,缺3卷。②移删挖改的情况较严重,如“疮肿门”“伤折门”“杂疗门”等,尤以“小儿门”为甚。③由于汪氏刻书时儿科部分已散佚,故儿科部分有后世补入的内容。其补入的内容几与《圣济总录纂要》同,证明与《纂要》同一来源,即所谓项视庵本。从版本的角度言,乾隆本并非一个完好的本子,造成这种状况的原因,是《圣济总录》版本在国内流传不佳所致。Objective The Qianlong edition of Sheng Ji Zong Lu （ Complete Record of Holy Benevolence ）, xylographed and reprinted by Wang Mingke in the fifty-second year of Emperor Qianlong＇s reign （1787） during the Qing Dynasty is incomplete and seriously patched up： （1） There is only 197 volumes in this version, with 3 volumes missing from the 200-volume original version; （2） This version is seriously shifted, tampered, and deleted in the sections of ＂ Sores ＂, ＂ wounds and fractures＂ ,＂ miscellaneous therapies＂ , especially the ＂Pediatrics＂ section ; （ 3 ） Some contents , supplemented to the ＂Pediatrics＂ section by later generations, were lost when Wang xylographed the version. The supplemented parts are identical with that of the ＂Sheng ji zong llu zuan yao （ Abridged Complete Records of Holy Benevolence ） ＂, demonstrating that both were derived from the same source, or the Xiangshi＇an＇s version. From the angle of version , the version of Emperor Qianlong reign is not a good one , because the versions of Shengfi zong lu are not well circulated in China.

关 键 词：圣济总录 乾隆本 版本分析 

分 类 号：G256.22[文化科学—图书馆学]