对“剑桥资本争论”的思考——从马克思的古典一般均衡理论寻求出路  

Reexamination on Cambridge Capital Argument——Study of Marxism classic general equilibrium theory

作　　者：刘磊[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学经济学院,天津300071

出　　处：《重庆工商大学学报（西部论坛）》2006年第5期26-32,共7页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University:West Forum

摘　　要：“剑桥资本争论”指出了新古典理论在资本计量、技术再转折和资本倒流等关键问题上所遇到的逻辑悖论。这是由于西方主流经济学将凯恩斯经济学嫁接在新古典的价值和分配理论之上,从而忽视了资本主义所特有的竞争关系。相反,马克思的古典经济学则强调了资本主义所特有的经济关系。因此,只有引入社会关系的古典一般均衡分析,才是解决争论的出路。Cambridge Capital Argument illustrates some logic paradoxes of neo - classic economics with the concepts of Capital Measurement, Re - switching of Technique and Reverse Capital, which is caused by the wrongly commingling of Keynes＇economics and the value and distribution theory of neo - classical economics, neglecting the special competitive relation of the capitalism. In contrast, Marx＇s economics deeply studied economic relations among the total variables on the basis of social relations. Thus, the only solution to this argument is to introduce the classic general equilibrium analysis of social relation.

关 键 词：剑桥资本争论 新古典理论 马克思经济学 

分 类 号：F091.3[经济管理—政治经济学]