从属下角度解读J.M.库切的小说《耻》  

An Interpretation of J.M.Coetzee's Disgrace From the Perspective of the Subaltern

作　　者：田晓南[1] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学外语系,北京100084

出　　处：《四川外语学院学报》2006年第6期38-42,共5页Journal of Sichuan International Studies University

摘　　要：库切的小说《耻》中所呈现的最为明显的特质就是女性属下不再沉默,她们有自己的话语,有自己的声音。而其主体性策略性地表达是通过对男性主体的坚定地消解、边缘化来实现的。这种再现方式与女性真实的自我体验是休戚相关的,并非源自于男性主体话语对女性的想像和构建。文本所呈现的意义对后殖民话语与属下之间的各种关系进行梳理,从而从属下角度对《耻》进行解读,揭示了库切作为一个“有机知识分子”,是如何在后殖民话语中显现属下的主体性,再现属下自己的声音。Subaltern study is always the major concern of the post-colonial study. In J. M. Coetzee＇ s Disgrace, silence is never a characteristic of the female subaltern, whereas it is phenomenally obvious that they have their own discourse and their own voice. In the process of the constant deconstruction as well as the marginalization of the male subject, the female subjectivity has been tactically represented. Moreover, this kind of representation is never imagined or constructed through the male subjective discourse. Actually it has a very close relationship with the female serf-experience. This paper thus clarifies the complicated relationship between the post-colonial discourse and the subaltern, represented in Disgrace, and attempts to interpret this text from the perspective of the subaltern, and further reveals how Coetzee, as an ＂organic intellectual＂, represents the subjectivity of the subaltern and their own voice in the post-colonial discourse.

关 键 词：属下 后殖民主义话语 主体性 后殖民南非 

分 类 号：I712.106.4[文学—其他各国文学]