口腔医学专业考生人格特点的中英样本比较  被引量:9

The Differences of Personality Styles Between the Chinese and English Dental School Applicants

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:武圣君[1] 苗丹民[1] 罗正学[1] 陈静[1] 王伟[1] 胡海燕[1] 

机构地区:[1]第四军医大学航空航天医学系心理学教研室,西安710032

出  处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2006年第11期720-722,共3页Chinese Mental Health Journal

基  金:全军医药卫生"十五"指令性课题(02L003)

摘  要:目的:比较中西方口腔医学专业考生人格特点的跨文化差异,为学校教育者的招生和教育工作提供有益的线索。方法:采用随机抽样,用中文版MBTI-G对317名中国某医科大学口腔医学专业的考生进行测试。结果:心理态度维度中,中国被试内倾型(Introversion I)(56·8%)大于外倾型(ExtroversionE)(43·2%),而英国被试则相反(15·7%对84·3%),二者之间差异有显著性(χ2=111·49,P<0·01);中、英被试中判断型(Judging J)的比例均高于认知型(Perceiving P),中英样本分别为63·7%与36·3%,93·6%与6·4%。其中英国判断型比例非常高(93·6%),二国间差异有显著性(χ2=80·92,P<0·01);心理功能维度,中、英被试未见显著差异;气质维度,中国被试NT(Intuition-Thinking)型气质(21·8%)大于NF(Intuition-Feeling)型(13·6%),英国被试则相反(16·1%对27·4%),差异有显著性(χ2=14·68,P<0·01);中、英被试SJ(Sensing-Judging)型气质比例均高于SP(Sensing-Perceiving)型,分别为42·9%对21·7%,55·5%对1·0%,二者差异有显著性(χ2=60·58,P<0·01),其中英国被试SP型的比例非常小(1·0%);人格类型中,中国被试比例最大的3种为ISTJ,ESTJ和ISFP。结论:中英口腔医学专业考生的人格特点存在显著差异,中国口腔医学的教育模式必须要有自己的特点,西方的教育模式和学习材料不宜直接用于中国而不做任何修订。Objective: To find out some clues in the personality types of Chinese dental school applicants and provide useful information in the cross-culture research between western and eastern countries, and supply guidance for Chinese educators. Methods: The Chinese version of MBTI ( Form G) was used to test the personality styles of 332 dental school applicants from the mainland of China, and the personality styles of dental school applicants between Chinese and English were compared. Results: In mental aptitude, the percentage of introversion ( I ) type in Chinese samples ( 56. 8% ) was higher than Extroversion ( E ) type ( 43.2% ) , while it was contrary in English samples ( 15.7% vs. 84. 3% ) and the difference was significant ( X^2 = 111.49, P 〈 0. 01 ) ; the percentage of Judging (J) type was higher than Perceiving (P) type in both samples ( 63.7% vs. 36. 3%, 93.6% vs. 6. 4% ) while the percentage of Judging ( J ) type was too high in English samples ( 93.6% ) that the level reached significant ( X^2= 80. 92, P 〈0. 01) ; there was no significant differences between Chinese and English samples in mental function; in temperament, the percentage of NT (Intuition-Thinking) in Chinese samples (21.8%) was higher than NF (Intuition-Feeling) ( 13.6% ) while the distribute was contrary in English ( 16. 1% vs. 27.4% ) and the difference was significant ( X^2 = 14. 68, P 〈 0. 01 ) ; the percentage of SJ (Sensing-Judging) was higher than SP ( Sensing-Perceiving) in both Chinese and English samples (42. 9% vs. 21.7% in Chinese, 55.5% vsl. 0% in English), and because the SP was so low in English ( 1.0% ) that the difference reached significant ( X^2 =60. 58, P 〈0. 01 ) ; in personality types, the three most dominant personality types were ESTJ, ISTJ and ISFP in Chinese applicants. Conclusion: There're indeed differences of personality styles between Chinese dental school applicants and English ones, so the model of e

关 键 词:心理测量 人格类型 横断面研究 MBTI 跨文化 气质 

分 类 号:G447[哲学宗教—心理学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象