检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:裴泓波[1] 李莹[2] 薛红丽[1] 王玉[1] 焦丹强[1] 薛莉[1] 徐颉哲[1] 苏峰 殷小娟[1] 贺琴[1] 高云波[4] 戴洪伟[5]
机构地区:[1]兰州大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学研究所,兰州730000 [2]甘肃省兰州市疾病预防控制中心 [3]甘肃省教育厅体卫处 [4]西北交通大学 [5]西北民族学院
出 处:《中国公共卫生》2006年第11期1289-1291,共3页Chinese Journal of Public Health
基 金:甘肃省教育厅科研项目(043-04)
摘 要:目的评价大学生志愿者面对面访谈式干预对外出务工人员进行艾滋病健康教育的效果,探索有效利用社会人才资源参与特殊人群公共卫生干预的策略及措施。方法分层随机整群抽取兰州市不同专业类别高校学生经培训作为干预者、调查员,利用寒假期间,由其对本人所在地返乡务工人员进行艾滋病相关知识的面对面访谈形式的宣教。被干预者在干预前后分别填写设计好的统一问卷。结果干预前后干预对象对艾滋病知识的正确知晓率提高(P<0.05)。面对面访谈模式健康教育的接受率由干预前的34.7%上升为干预后的66.2%(P<0.05)。88.9%的干预对象表示要将学到的知识传播给他人。结论大学生是不容忽视的社会资源,由其对外出务工者这一特殊群体进行面对面访谈式干预有较强的适宜性和可行性,且干预有效。Objective To understand the effection of health education given by college student volunteers among the peolple who worked outside as the temporary workers, and to explore the effective strategy and measures of making good use of qualified people in public health. Methods The student volunteers of three different colleges were choosed by stratified cluster sampling and trained as interferors and investigators. The same two questionnaires were answered by the workes respectively before and after the interviews given by the students in their winter vacation. Results The rates of accurate learning for knowledge of AIDS were improved after intervention(P 〈 0.05). Reception ratio for the type of the intervention raised from 34.7% to 66.2%(P〈0.05).And 88.9% workers would share the knowledge with more persons. Conclusion College students made the important role in social resources. The reception, feasibility and effectiveness of the intervention were proved.
分 类 号:R167[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171