两种灌溉取水监督管理制度的分析比较  

Analytic Comparison of Two Kinds of Irrigation Water Intake Supervision and Management Systems

作　　者：周晓熙[1] 郑旭荣[2] 

机构地区：[1]华中农业大学经济管理-土地管理学院,武汉430070 [2]石河子大学水利建筑工程学院,新疆石河子832003

出　　处：《中国农村水利水电》2006年第11期11-13,共3页China Rural Water and Hydropower

基　　金：国家"863"计划项目(项目编号:2002AA2Z4201);中国博士后科学基金(编号:2004036287)资助

摘　　要：违规取用地表水灌溉,在水资源有限的情况下,从一定程度上损害了公共利益,并对他人不能进行补偿,因而是一种外部不经济的行为。我国对取水权的监督管理权掌握在政府手中,由流域机构具体管理。而国外某些地区对灌溉取水的监督权是分散在各个与灌溉系统相关的人员或机构手中,与此相关的人员或机构既是监督者,同时又被别人监督。比较分析了这两种不同的取水监督管理制度的优缺点,并给出完善我国取水监督管理制度的建议。To some extend, the commonality benefit is harmed if infringing the surface-water irrigation rights without compensation for limited water resources, so this is external diseconomy action. In China, water intake supervision right is controlled by the government and is managed concretely by basin organization. While, in some areas abroad, the irrigation water intake supervision right is controlled by corresponding irrigation organizations or personnel, so they arc not only supervisor but also are supervised by others. In the paper, the two kinds of water intake supervision management systems are compared, and the suggestions for perfecting the supervision and management system of water intake in China are presented.

关 键 词：灌溉取水 监督管理 取水制度 

分 类 号：TV213.4[水利工程—水文学及水资源]