检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Yonghong Yang
机构地区:[1]Southwest University of Political Science and Law
出 处:《US-China Law Review》2005年第7期60-73,共14页美中法律评论(英文版)
摘 要:This essay focuses on the Transitional Products- Specific Safeguard mechanism (TPS clause), Section 16 of China's Protocol on Accession to WTO and the conflicts between the TPS clause and the WTO law. The TPS clause carries out selective safeguard mechanism prohibited by GATT, adopts the concept of "market disrupt", permits application of gray measures and allows relative member states taking unilateral acts. Furthermore, trade diversion created by the TPS clause could bring a vital attack to Chinese industries. The TPS clause with those features can ruin not only Chinese economic development but also the effectiveness of WTO system. China must do best to minimize the negative impact that the TPS clause may cause to Chinese economy and WTO regime.
关 键 词:Transitional Products-Specific Safeguard mechanism Most-Favored-Nation Treatment Market disruption Selective safeguards measures Gray measure Trade diversion
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15