检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学地方政府与社会治理研究中心 [2]浙江工商大学法学院
出 处:《社会学研究》2006年第6期45-73,共29页Sociological Studies
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目"城郊农民市民化问题研究"(06BSH019)。
摘 要:城郊农民并不都是欢迎地方政府的“撤村建居”工程的。本文运用经过修正的斯科特关于农民道义经济学的“安全第一”理论,选择浙江J市的一些城郊村作案例分析,提出城郊农民的排拒主要基于其不安全感:即在政府所推动的城市化进程中,农民原来的安全条件很容易受到破坏,而满足其安全需要的替代方式却不易建立,甚至还没有被当成重要问题;农民在日常生活中很容易感到强烈的风险与转型不安全,包括经济不安全、社会不安全以及政治不安全等等。Suburban farmers don't always welcome the project of “dismantling villages and setting up urban communities' carried out by local governments. The phenomenon is usually explained as the local governments' failure to satisfy the minimum economic requirements of suburban farmers. The author takes the revised theory of “safety goes first' put forward by J. Scott, picking out some suburban villages in J city, Zhejiang province, the case study shows that the reason of the resistance of suburban farmers is the sense of insecurity. In other words, in the process of urbanization prompted by the government, the original security conditions are easily damaged, but this problem has not been taken seriously, not to mention establish the substitutes for satisfying farmers' safety requirements. In their daily lives, farmers tend to have a sense of high risk and insecurity during the transformation, including the economic insecurity, social insecurity and political insecurity, etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112