检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹新向[1]
出 处:《经济地理》2006年第6期1062-1066,共5页Economic Geography
基 金:教育部人文社科基金项目(编号:YRCSD-06B-06)资助
摘 要:根据生态足迹模型,构建了旅游地生态安全评价的指标体系和方法,并以人均旅游生态足迹和人均旅游用地承载力的比值I来确定旅游地生态安全的状况。以开封市为研究区域,采用以上指标体系,对2005年开封市旅游生态安全状况进行了评价。研究结果表明:2005年开封市人均生态旅游足迹为0.02361hm2,其中交通足迹最大,占到88.9%;其次是餐饮,为7.72%。人均旅游用地承载力为0.04180hm2,生态安全度为0.56,处于一种一般状态或者说较为安全的状态。通过计算也发现开封市旅游生态安全度在增大,说明旅游活动对生态系统的压力越来越大,因此,关注旅游生态问题应当成为旅游可持续发展的一个关键问题。最后对模型的应用前景和问题进行了讨论。Assessing ecological security of tourism destination has an important meaning of theories and practice and it is a precondition and foundation to study ecological security. Based on ecological footprint model, the paper designed a series of indexes system to assessing ecologi- cal security and set up a ratio I to make sure the situation of ecological security. Took Kaifeng city as an example, adopted the method of ecological footprint analyses and constructed evaluation method and indexes system. The result showed: Average ecological footprint of every person was 0.02361hm2 in 2005, among transport was 88.9%, next food and drink was 7.72%. Average person tourism land carrying capacity was 0.04180hm^2 and ecological security degree was 0.56 which showed it was in a more safe condition. Compare to tourism environment capacity and synthetically indexes method, the result was more reasonable. Some problems and application foreground were also analyzed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.135.12