国内外航空发动机研制过程中评审工作的对比分析  

Analysis of the difference between reviews of overseas and domestic aero-engine in developing process

作　　者：杨锐[1] 郝勇[2] 张恩和[2] 李其汉[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京航空航天大学能源与动力工程学院,北京100083 [2]沈阳发动机设计研究所,辽宁沈阳110015

出　　处：《航空动力学报》2006年第6期1059-1063,共5页Journal of Aerospace Power

摘　　要：评审是航空发动机研制过程中一个必不可少,至关重要的阶段,组织缜密、有效地评审对于降低研制风险、缩短周期、减少反复将起到不可或缺的作用。本文分别介绍了罗罗公司对某高压压气机技术方案的评审,和国内某发动机技术设计的评审。通过对评审人员的组成、评审内容和资料的准备以及评审结论、跟踪检查的对比,分析了两次评审在评审过程、评审机制等方面的差异。The review is absolutely necessary matter and phase in the developing process of an aero-engine. The pertinent and effective review is a great help to the aero-engine being developed. The concept review of a HP Compressor which carried out broadly according to the formal Rolls-Royce technical review was introduced and a domestic aero-engine concept review was introduced also. The two review process and mechanism and etc. were analyzed according to the comparing with the review committee, prepared data, and review conclu sions as well as tracicing examination.

关 键 词：航空 航天推进系统 评审 高压压气机 罗罗公司 

分 类 号：V23[航空宇航科学与技术—航空宇航推进理论与工程]