激电测深法勘查效果的对比分析  

A COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF THE IP SOUNDING METHODS

作　　者：苑守成[1] 陈达[2] 罗先中[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国地质大学,北京100083 [2]北京勘察技术工程有限公司,北京100037

出　　处：《物探与化探》2006年第6期529-532,共4页Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration

摘　　要：在应用激电法进行普、详查时,往往需要投入激电测深工作。结合固定点源测深法与常规电测深法(对称四极测深、温纳测深)在某铅锌矿区的对比应用研究成果,归纳分析了3种不同电测深法的各自应用效果,认为在确定矿体的中心埋深、几何形态、赋存状态等方面固定点源测深法优于常规电测深法。Using the results from the fixed point sounding and the traditional sounding methods （symmetric quadrupole sounding and Wenner sounding） in a certain lead-zinc ore district, the authors summed up the results of three different methods. It is held that the fixed point source sounding method is superior to the traditional electrical sounding methods in such aspects as the determination of the central buried depth, geometric shape, and mode of occurrence of the ore body.

关 键 词：激电测深法 固定点源测深 对称四极测深 温纳测深 

分 类 号：P631[天文地球—地质矿产勘探]