检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林卉[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江广播电视大学法律系,浙江杭州310012
出 处:《浙江体育科学》2006年第6期20-23,共4页Zhejiang Sport Science
摘 要:文章简要介绍了体育自治的理论背景和实践情况,以及体育纠纷对司法介入的排除。首先对体育自治作了初步的定义,并从规则自治、组织自治和纠纷自治三方面对目前体育自治在中西方国家的现状作了一些分析,对体育自治的基本要素进行了归纳。其次,通过对国内体育自治立法滞后的原因分析和国外体育自治立法的介绍,将国内外体育自治的立法状况作了比较。第三,通过分析近年来国内出现的具代表性的体育案例,结合国际权威体育组织的有关章程,总结了体育自治对体育纠纷解决机制的影响,并详细介绍了国内体育纠纷解决的现状和国外体育纠纷解决的惯例及机构。The chapter is about the theoretical background of the sports autonomy and its actuality, characteristics and legislation factor in China and western countries. First, by making the definition of sports autonomy and analyzing the actuality of it in China and western countries from the viewpoint of legislation, administration and arbitration, induces the essential factor of sports autonomy. Second, by analyzing the cause of lagged legislation in China and introducing the legislation for sports affair in western countries, we compare the legislation for sports affair between China and western countries. Third, by analyzing the typical cases in China, combining international sports organization's constitution, summarize the infection of the sports autonomy to the rule mechanism of sports dissension, and then present the circumstances of rule of sports dissension in China and those in western countries.
分 类 号:G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3