两种制度经济学范式中的意识形态理论:分歧与根源  

Ideology Theories in Two Paradigms of Institutional Economics: Divarication and Roots

作　　者：孙凤仪[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京工商大学社科部,北京100037

出　　处：《理论学刊》2006年第12期28-31,共4页Theory Journal

摘　　要：作为制度经济学的两种范式,新制度经济学和马克思经济学的意识形态理论在意识形态的本质和功能、意识形态的根源与变迁、意识形态与制度变迁的关系、意识形态的未来归宿等方面存在着明显的分歧。整体来看,马克思的分析框架迄今仍是最有说服力的。这些分歧的根源是方法论:以诺思为代表的新制度经济学的传统方法论是制度个体主义和建构理性主义;而马克思的制度经济学的方法论是制度整体主义与制度个体主义的统一、演进理性主义与建构理性主义的统一。As the two paradigms of institutional economies,the obvious distinctions of ideology between Neo-institutional Economics and Marxist Economics lie in several aspects,such as the innate character and functions,causes and changes of ideology,relationship of ideology and institutional changes,and the future devolopment of ideology,etc.Generally speaking,the analysis frame of Maxism is still the most convincing at present.The roots of the divarication are as follows: The traditional methodology of Neo-institutional Economics,represented by North,is rationalistic constructionism and institutional individualism,while that of Maxist Economics is the combination of institutional holism and institutional individualism,and the combination of evolutive rationalism and rationalistic constructionism.institutional evolvement.

关 键 词：制度经济学 意识形态 意识形态理论 分歧 根源 

分 类 号：F091.349[经济管理—政治经济学] A811.6[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]