检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王金堂[1]
出 处:《青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2006年第4期98-105,共8页Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:山东省软科学研究计划项目(B2005024)
摘 要:我国农村已经形成了以农地承包制为基础的农地产权制度,但由于现行《土地承包法》没能廓清农地承包权和农地集体所有权的界限,导致两者的权能产生内在冲突并形成了农地产权制度的困境。由于缺乏适格的集体土地所有者现实主体,在现有的政治经济条件约束下,走出这一困境的最优选择是弱化农地集体所有权,强化农地承包经营权并将之赋予农民,实现农地承包经营权的完全物权化。The household land property right system which based on the farmland contract system has already formed in the rural areas of our country. However, there is not a clear demarcation line between farmland contraetual right and farmland collective ownership right in the eurrent Land Contract Law, which produced an inherent conflict of power & function and formed the predicament of the household land property right system. For lack of competent realistic subject of collective land owners, under the existing restrictive political and economic conditions, the optimum choice of getting out of this predicament is to weaken the collective ownership of farmland, strengthen managerial authority over rural contracted household land and return it to farmers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222