检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶滔[1] 扈克明[1] 佘宇平[1] 朱启忠 罗忠
机构地区:[1]中国科学院昆明生态研究所,昆明650223 [2]思茅市茶叶科技发展公司 [3]国营西双版纳大渡岗茶场
出 处:《植物保护学报》1996年第4期310-314,共5页Journal of Plant Protection
摘 要:作者根据1988~1993年对云南省南部西双版纳和思茅地区茶园中的茶小绿叶蝉的生物生态学特性研究结果,遵照IPM的要求设计了:①以采代治,②试用新防治历,③按防治指标防治,④生物防治,4个分项防治措施,并进行了分项小区试验和综合利用这些防治措施的综合防治试验。试验结果表明:设计的4项单一防治措施和综合防治措施,在对茶叶产量和质量无影响,而又能控制茶园小绿叶蝉为害的情况下,经济和人力投入都比传统的化学防治方法少,而且降低了茶叶中农药残留量。Based on the bionomics studies carried out in 1988-1993 on smaller green leafhopper Empoasca flavescens (F. ) in tea plantations in Xishuangbanna and Simao Areas, Yunnan Province,four integrated management practices of this insect pest,namely: (1)to pick tea instead of chemical control; (2)to try out new control calender; (3)to practice action threshold;and (4) to use biological control,were proposed and tested separately and synthetically in field plots. It was confirmed that as the population of smaller green leafhopper was kept under control by applying these new practices, there was no harmful effect of them separately and synthetically on tea production and quality, the cost of control was lower than that of the traditional chemical control,the insecticide residue in tea production was effectively reduced.
分 类 号:S435.711[农业科学—农业昆虫与害虫防治]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

