检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2006年第6期588-590,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:中国科学院重要方向项目(KSCX2-SW-221)的部分工作
摘 要:目的:探索大学生在人格问卷测谎量表上的得分与反应时之间的关系,并且验证测谎量表得分与其他人格维度的关系。方法:采用“艾森克人格问卷”和“眀尼苏达多相人格测试”中的测谎量表,对132名高校学生进行测查。结果:大学生在测谎量表上的得分与反应时间存在正相关(P<0.05),测谎量表得分高的被试反应时间显著长于得分低的被试的反应时间(P<0.01)。此外,测谎量表的得分与神经质存在负相关(P<0.01),与精神质存在负相关(P<0.01)。结论:本研究发现了反应时与测谎量表得分的关系,为直接测量手段引入传统量表测验做了一定的铺垫。Objective: To explore the relationship between college students' lie scale scores of personality questionnaire and response latency, and verify relationship between lie scale scores and other dimensionalities of personality. Methods: 132 college students were examined by the lie scales of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Results: There was significantly positive correlation between scores on lie scales and response latency (P〈0.05); college students who got high scores on lie scales had longer response latency than the low ones (P〈0.01); and it also presented a negative correlation in the relationship between the lie scale scores and both Neuroticism (P〈0.01 ) and Psychoticism (P〈0.01 ). Conclusion: This newly discovered correlation between lie scale scores and response latency could be taken as a good base for adopting the means of direct measurement into traditional scales.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.120.131