检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国药科大学商学院,江苏南京210038 [2]江苏省社会科学院现代化研究中心,江苏南京210013
出 处:《南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2006年第4期40-45,共6页Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:运用费景汉、拉尼斯(1961)提出的衡量技术创新类型的分析框架,实证分析了我国改革以来的工业化技术对我国农村剩余劳力转移的影响①,对我国非农劳力增长进行了技术分解,并与日本、印度的工业化数据进行了比较;经验数据表明90年代末起我国非农劳力增长率与总人口增长率已非常接近,而技术创新吸纳剩余劳力表现为较高的负增长,出现资本密集化趋势。本文认为我国工业化任务尚未完成,应发展劳动密集型产业,以较少的资本最大限度地吸纳农村剩余劳力,直至消除二元结构。Using the analysis framework of distinguishing the technique type put forward by Fei & Ranis in 1961 , the article analyzes the effect of the industrialization on the rural labor surplus and technically decomposes the increase of non - farm labor since the country' s reform open - door policy implementation and makes a comparison with the data from Japan and India. It is found that since the end of 90s, the increase rate of non - farm labour has been approximately equal to that of total population and the transformation of rural surplus labour experienced a negative increase resulted from the capital - intensive tendency in technique innovation. We argue that the labor - intensive industry should further absorb rural surplus labor with less capital before the dual economy is over as China' s industrialization has not yet completed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7