检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽省疾病预防控制中心,安徽合肥230061
出 处:《中国卫生工程学》2006年第6期330-332,共3页Chinese Journal of Public Health Engineering
摘 要:目的了解试点卫生村居室内空气质量,为制定《卫生村建设与验收技术规范》提供依据。方法采用现场测定与实验室检验。结果两地居室内空气中几种污染物测定结果均值范围分别为:CO1.25-1.73mg/m^3、CO2 20.06%-0.08%、IP0.13~0.24mg/m^3、细菌总数1460~3478cfu/m^3、甲醛0.02-0.04mg/m^3、氡23.6~122.18Bq/m^3。空气中CO、CO2、IP、细菌总数均有超标现象,超标最严重是IP(77.0%)。不同居室测定结果的比较,厨房高于卧室。结论试点卫生村居室内空气质量欠佳,需进一步加强对农村卫生村规划与建设技术指导。Objective To explore the indoor air quality of hygiene villages and to provide evidences for developing "Hygienic Village Construction and Approval Technology Standard". Methods The methods of field determination and lab examination were used. Results Ranges of Average value of pollutants in indoor air were: CO 1.25 - 1.73 mg/m^3 , CO20. 06 % - 0.08 %, IP 0.13 - 0.24 mg/m^3 , air banterium total count 1 460- 3 478 cfu/m^3 , formaldehyde 0 .02 - 0.04 mg/m^3 , radon 23.6 - 122.18 Bq/m^3 . CO, CO2, IP and air bacterium total count exceeded the allowed limits, which IP (77.0%) exceeded seriously. The resuits also showed that the determinant values of pollutants in the kitchen were higher than those in the bedroom. Conclusion The indoor air quality in hygiene village is unsatisfactory. Further strengthening to the hygiene viilage program and the technical guidance to the construction and technology shoold be applied to reduce indoor air pollution.
分 类 号:R126[医药卫生—环境卫生学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222