检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘华英[1] 陈英[1] 寇淑珍[1] 牛小燕[1]
机构地区:[1]天津市儿童医院,天津300074
出 处:《天津护理》2006年第6期317-318,共2页Tianjin Journal of Nursing
摘 要:目的:比较两种鼻腔滴药方法对儿童鼻窦炎疗效的影响。方法:将200例上颌窦积液的患儿随机分成观察组和对照组,分别采用侧卧垂头位及仰卧垂头位两种鼻腔滴药方法。2周后统计两种鼻腔滴药体位对鼻窦炎患儿疗效的影响及患儿滴药时的舒适度有何差异。结果:观察组有效率与舒适度均高于对照组,P<0.05。结论:侧卧垂头位鼻腔滴药法可以准确地将药液滴入中鼻道,达到使中鼻道黏膜减轻充血和上颌窦积液彻底引流的目的,提高治疗效果,患儿乐于接受。Objective: To compare the effects of two positions of nasal drops on children rhinosinusitis. Method:200 rhinasinusitis cases were ramdomly divided into the experimental group and the control group. Both of the "on side,head down"and "on back, head down" position were adopted respectively in two groups. The statistical analysis was made of different effect of two positions of nasal drops and conffort indexes two week later. Results: The effectiveness and conffort indexes of the experimentat group was better than that of the control group,P〈0.05. Conclusion: The "on side, head down"position of nasal drops can be delivered consistently into the middle meatus, readily assist drainage and ventilation of the sinus maxillarix and thus lead to rapid recovery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3