检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连理工大学人文社会科学学院,辽宁大连116024
出 处:《哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2006年第6期57-62,共6页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:辽宁省科技计划项目(2006401024)
摘 要:中国逐步建立起一套解决网络域名与商标权纠纷的机制,其中包括行政规制、司法救济、域名争议解决中心的裁决。行政规制作为早期解决网络域名与商标权冲突的机制,曾起到积极作用,但在权利救济上存在明显的瑕疵;而现行的争议解决机制———司法救济、域名争议解决中心的裁决在某些方面又存在冲突与矛盾。建议取消网络域名与商标权纠纷的行政规制,明确域名和商标权纠纷应由侵权行为地或被告住所地法院管辖,延长提交司法诉讼的缓冲时间。In order to solve the conflict between domain name and trademark right , China has gradually developed a set of integrated mechanism including administrative regulation, judicial relief and adjudication by Domain Name Dispute - settled Center. Administrative regulation, as an early mechanism in settling the conflict between domain name and trademark right, has played a active role, but it has obvious flaws in the administrative relief. However, the present dispute settlement mechanism, such as judicial relief and adjudication by Domain Name Dispute Settlement Center, conflict with each other in some aspects. The paper suggests that the administrative regulation should be abolished, the court where the tort happens or the defendant resides should be identified to have jurisdiction over the conflict between domain name and trademark right and the time for submitting the lawsuit to the court should be lengthened.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117