海德格尔的栖居观与陶渊明隐居观比较研究  

Comparison on Tao Yuanming's 'Live in Reclusion' and Heidegger's 'Live'

作　　者：崔晖[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学哲学与社会学学院,北京100875

出　　处：《北京印刷学院学报》2006年第6期50-52,共3页Journal of Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication

摘　　要：中国古代思想要获得新的生机,离不开与西方哲学及其他学科的对话。但是,众所周知,只有为数不多的一种或几种西方思想能与中国某种思想发生有机的交和及繁衍变通,只有少数思想家能与中国古代思想进行有孕育力的对话。20世纪初的思想大师德国哲学家海德格尔是一个待选者。如果我们正确地理解了海德格尔的栖居观及陶渊明的隐居思想,那么两者之间就有了思想上对话的可能。Ancient Chinese thought cannot obtain new vigor without dialogue with Western philosophy and other disciplines. However, it is well-known that only a few Western thoughts can merge with certain ancient Chinese thought and achieve new development and that only a few Western thinkers are suitable for such productive dialogue with ancient Chinese thought. This paper intends to show that Heidegger, the thinking master in the early 20th Century is an eminently qualified, and the ideological dialogue between Heidegger and Tao Yuanming is quite possible once we properly understand Heidegger＇s ＂Live＂ and Tao Yuanming＇s ＂Live in Reclusion＂ despite their two distinct differences.

关 键 词：海德格尔 陶渊明 存在 栖居 隐居 

分 类 号：B089[哲学宗教—哲学理论]