检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李华[1] 蒋岸岸[1,2] 于辉[1] 吕学斌[3] 李学伟[2] 赵海全[1]
机构地区:[1]佛山大学生命科学学院,佛山528231 [2]四川农业大学动物科技学院,雅安625014 [3]四川省畜牧科学研究院,成都610061
出 处:《高技术通讯》2006年第12期1294-1299,共6页Chinese High Technology Letters
基 金:国家自然科学基金(30300246)资助项目.
摘 要:对甘孜藏猪和合作猪SLA-DQA基因的第1和第2内含子部分序列以及完整的第2外显子进行了PCR-RFLP分析,结果表明:经EcoRⅠ酶切后,BB基因型频率(0.5537)分别高于AB型(0.3719)和从型(0.0744);B为优势等位基因(0.7397)。经AluⅠ酶切后,MM基因型频率(0.4380)分别高于MN型(0.3637)和NN型(0.1983);M为优势等位基因(0.6198)。2品种中AluⅠ酶切基因型在合作猪中未达到Hardy-Weinberg平衡,且群体间M、N的基因频率和NN基因型频率差异分别达极显著(P〈0.01)和显著水平(P〈0.05)。共鉴别了9种组合基因型,甘孜藏猪和合作猪分别为6和8种组合基因型,BB-MM、BBNN组合基因型频率在两群体间差异显著(P〈0.05)。两酶切位点均表现为中度多态,AluⅠ位点多态信息含量均高于EcoRⅠ位点,合作猪杂合性高于甘孜藏猪,两群体间的遗传距离为0.0389。The partial sequences of intron 1 and intron 2, and the complete sequence of exon 2 of SLA-DQA gene in Ganzhi Zang pigs (GZ) and Hezuo pigs (HZ) were analysed by PCR-RFLP. The results showed that the genotype frequency of BB (0.5537) at EcoR I-RFLP site was higher than that of AB (0.3719) and AA (0.0744). B (0.7397) was the predominant allele. To the Alu I-RFEP site, the genotype frequency of MM (0.4380) was higher than that of MN (0.3637) and NN (0. 1983) in the two population pigs, and M (0.6198) was the predominant allele. The values of χ^2(CHITEST) showed that the genotypes at Alu I site in Hezuo pigs were not fit with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. There were significant differences for M, N allele frequency ( P 〈 0.01 ) and NN genotype frequency ( P 〈 0.05) between GZ and HZ at different levels. There were nine PCR-RFLP patterns of SLA-DQA gene in the two population pigs, six in GZ and eight in HZ, respectively. The genotype frequency of BBMM and BBNN was significantly different between the two population pigs ( P 〈 0.05). Both sites were moderately polymorphic, but the polymorphism information content (PIC) at Alu I site was higher than that at EcoR I site, the heterozygosity was higher in HZ than that in GZ, and the Nei's unbiased genetic distance was 0.0389 between the two population pigs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4