检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:康宏琳[1] 阎超[1] 李亭鹤[1] 郭迪龙[2]
机构地区:[1]北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院,北京100083 [2]中国科学院力学研究所,北京100080
出 处:《北京航空航天大学学报》2006年第12期1395-1398,共4页Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
摘 要:基于跟踪流线的轴对称比拟法,采用纯工程算法、Euler数值计算与边界层内工程算法相结合的方法,对高超声速再入钝头体的表面热流进行了计算,并将计算结果与风洞实验数据进行了对比,两者吻合较好,验证了两种工程算法在计算高超声速飞行器热环境方面的正确性.将两种工程算法与数值求解N-S方程进行对比,表明工程算法在迎风面的热流计算方面有较高的精度,节约了计算时间,很好地满足高超声速飞行器概念研究和设计的需要.In order to calculate the heating rates on hypersonic blunt bodies quickly and effectively, two engineering methods were developed based upon the axisymmetric analogue which required tracking the inviscid surface streamlines. Engineering predictions in the boundary layer were used in both methods. However, method No. 1 used engineering predictions out of the boundary layer, and in method No. 2 the boundary-layer edge conditions were determined by the CFD method solved by Euler equations of three dimensions. Results of the two methods are in good agreement with the existing experimental data, which validates the correctness of the methods in calculating the heating rates on hypersonic vehicles. Results of these two engineering methods were also compared with those of CFD method solved by N-S equations, which indicates that the engineering methods save much calculating time and also have precision on predicting the heating rates on windward.
分 类 号:V211.3[航空宇航科学与技术—航空宇航推进理论与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.76