检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨军[1]
机构地区:[1]重庆工商大学,重庆400067
出 处:《重庆工商大学学报(西部论坛)》2006年第6期15-20,共6页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University:West Forum
基 金:国家哲社基金专项资助西部地区研究项目(04XJY028)"对西部若干国家贫困县的调查研究及对策建议"
摘 要:从以项目管理为中心的大规模区域性扶贫开发和“到村到户”扶贫转换到“整村推进”扶贫模式,取得了明显的扶贫效果。但在实践中还有许多问题和矛盾,如“整村推进”目标要求与资金投入保障不匹配、“真扶贫”与“扶真贫”的关系错位等,因此亟待从创新机制入手完善“整村推进”模式。The poverty alleviation mode, which experienced from big scale regional poverty alleviation development by taking project management as a center, to the mode of poverty alleviation for "villages and families", and to the mode of "using whole village's resources to develop", has made obvious achievement in poverty alleviation. However, there are still many problems and contradictions in practice, such as the unmatched relation between the objective of "using whole village's resources to develop" and capital investment guarantee, dislocated relation between "real poverty alleviation" and "alleviating real poverty" and so on. Thus, it is necessary to complete the mode of "using whole village's resources to develop" from the angle of innova- tion mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117