检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]沈阳药科大学工商管理学院,沈阳市110016
出 处:《中国药房》2007年第1期4-6,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:对医疗机构药品集中招标采购的有效性与合理性进行探讨。方法:全面、综合分析药品集中招标采购存在的问题及其成因。结果与结论:药品集中招标采购不是解决药价虚高和药品购销不正之风等问题的有效手段,但作为过渡措施暂可继续实行。相关部门应完善药品的定价方法,整顿药品生产领域的竞争秩序,改革医疗机构的成本补偿机制,为实现药品供求双方的直接、自主交易创造必要的条件。OBJECTIVE: To discuss the effectiveness and rationality of medical institution's pharmaceuticals procurement by tender bidding. METHODS: To analyze the problems arising from medical institution' s pharmaceuticals procurement by tender bidding and their causations. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS- Medical institution' s pharmaceuticals procurement by tender bidding is not an effective method for solving the problems of false high price of drugs and corruptions related to pharmaceuticals procurement, but as a transitional measure, it can be implemented temporarily. Meanwhile, the pricing method for pharmaceuticals should be improved, the order of the competition in pharmaceuticals manufacturing sector should be regulated, and the mechanism of costs recovering for medical institutions should be reformed. These measures will be the essential conditions for the suppliers and demanders of pharmaceuticals to trade directly and freely in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145