检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢秀萍[1]
机构地区:[1]中国烟草育种研究(南方)中心,云南玉溪653100
出 处:《西南农业学报》2006年第6期1014-1018,共5页Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences
基 金:国家烟草专卖局科技项目(110200401007)
摘 要:采用灰色关联度分析法和DTOPSIS法分别对烤烟区域试验中各参试品种进行了多性状的综合评判。结果表明,在产量、品质、抗病性三者兼顾的情况下,两种综合评价方法的评判结果基本相同,并与品种实际表现相符。但灰色关联度方法品种间差异不大,DTOPSIS法评价结果中Ci值差异十分明显,能更好地评价品种的优劣。Two analysis methods namely Grey correlation and DIOPSIS were employed for multi-trait evaluation of flue-cured tobacco varieties entered the variety test. The results showed that given attention to the yield, the quality and the disease resistance, the two evaluation methods gave the similar results and the results were in consistent with the actual performance of the tested varieties. By using the grey correlation analysis,there were no significant differences among the varieties,while by DTOPSIS,the differences among the Ci values were significant,it indicated that DIOPSIS can do better in evaluating the performances of the varieties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229