检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国管理科学》2006年第6期44-49,共6页Chinese Journal of Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70472033)
摘 要:电子行业的生产商始终是其逆向物流模式选择的主体,本文定量分析了三种回收处理模式的决策模型及其最优决策的基本性质。研究表明:从收益决策出发,自建回收处理系统总可以获得最大收益并可以以最低价格参与竞争。然而,其回收努力系数却可能最小;回收产品可再制造比率越大越能激发回收处理的积极性,获得较大的回收努力系数。结论指出生产商应该结合环保和法规要求根据各模式最优决策的性质选择合适的逆向物流运作模式。The producer is always a leader in choosing its own reverse logistics system in electronic industry. In this paper, three reverse logistics models and their attributes are analyzed and proved. The attributes show that in view of incomes the producer should always choose building its own reverse logistics system in which can be gained the maximum incomes and the minimum prices. However, the return rate in this system may be the least one. It is also shown that the more remanufacturing rate of returns, the more return rate can be got. Conclusion shows that the best reverse logistics system should be decided by considering of environment and the acts, as well as the attributes of different models.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.77.120