检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王希辉[1]
出 处:《天津医科大学学报》2006年第4期558-559,共2页Journal of Tianjin Medical University
摘 要:目的:探讨全麻(GA)和腰-硬联合麻醉(CSEA)对肾移植术后患者肾功能的影响是否存在差异。方法:择期行肾移植手术的尿毒症患者80例,随机分为2组(GA组和CSEA组),每组40例。记录移植肾血流开放后24h内每组患者的总尿量和血肌酐下降百分比。结果:GA组开放后24h内尿量为(10320±3640)ml,血肌酐下降百分比为(40±13)%;CSEA组开放后24h内尿量为(9850±3470)ml,血肌酐下降百分比为(41±12)%。组间比较差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:全麻和腰-硬联合麻醉2种麻醉方法对肾移植术后患者肾功能的影响无差别。To compare the effect of general anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia on the renal function after allograft. Methods: Eighty adult patients undergoing renal transplantation were randomly divided into two groups receiving general anesthesia (GA) or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA). In each group there were 40 cases.According to the urinary volume after reperfusion and the creatinine decreased in 24 hours,the function of renal allograft were estimated. Results: The total urinary volume after reperfusion in 24 hours was (10 320±3 640) ml(GA)and (9 850±3 470)ml(CSEA) respectively; the percentage of creatinine decreased in 24 hours was (40.2±12.7)%(GA) and (41.2±11.9)%(CSEA) respectively. Conclusion: There are no significant differences in two groups.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104