类比法与归谬法的比较研究  

The Study of Compare between Analogism and Induction to Absurdity

作　　者：盛新华[1] 卢芸蓉[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学文学与新闻学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《河池学院学报》2006年第6期23-26,56,共5页Journal of Hechi University

基　　金：湖南省社科基金项目(项目编号:03YB67)

摘　　要：类比法与归谬法是两种既有联系又有区别的逻辑推理方法。它们之间在构成的心理基础、客观依据以及论证模式、借助手法等方面相同;在建构方法的复杂程度、语用效果、语用策略、语用风格等方面有区别。区分类比法与归谬法的同异,目的在于在论证中更好地运用这两种方法,使论证更具有说服力。Analogism and induction to absurdity are two kind logic inference and between them there are some connection and difference. The same between them are the psychological ground of compose, objective foundation, argument model and skill of drawing support from other; the difference between them are the complex in degree of form method, pragmatic effect, pragmatic strategy and language style. Distinguishing them is to use them better in argumentation and to be more forceful in persuasion.

关 键 词：类比法 归谬法 相同 相异 论证 

分 类 号：B812.23[哲学宗教—逻辑学]