检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马全有[1] 张留沙[1] 成杰[1] 王路平[1]
出 处:《中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志》2007年第1期18-19,共2页Chinese Journal of Neuroimmunology and Neurology
摘 要:目的探讨分期综合治疗急性CO中毒后迟发性脑病(DEACMP)的临床疗效。方法将68例DEACMP患者随机分为观察组(34例)和对照组(34例)。观察组采取脑病加重期和恢复期分期综合治疗,对照组施以高压氧等常规治疗。结果观察组和对照组痊愈率、显效率、有效率分别为61.76%、26.47%、11.77%和23.53%、20.59%、26.47%。观察组疗效明显高于对照组(x^2=17.95,P〈0.01)。观察组病程27~130d,平均64.73d;对照组病程66~290d,平均182.06d。结论分期综合治疗DEACMP疗效较好,病程较短,是临床较理想的治疗方法。Objective To investigate the clinical curative effects of patients with delayed encephalopathy after acute CO poisoning (DEACMP). Methods Sixty-eight patients with DEACMP were divided at random into research group (34 cases) and control group (34 eases). The patients with DEACMP in research group were treated synthetically by stages. The patients with DEACMP in control group were treated with routine way, such as hyperbaric oxygen, Results In research group, the cure rate, significant improvement rate and effective rate were 61. 76%, 26.47 % and 11. 77 % respectively. While in control group, the cure rate, significant improvement rate and effective rate were 23. 53%, 20.59% and 26.47% respectively. The comparison of the two groups showed significant difference in clinical curative effect (x^2=17.95, P〈0.01). Conclusions It is an ideal method that the patients with DEACMP to be treated synthetically by stages.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145